The Attack on Doha Violates UN Charter

…In its first announcement following its bombardment of Qatar, Doha, Netanyahu’s Office reports: “The operation carried out today against senior Hamas leaders in Qatar was an entirely Israeli operation. Israel initiated it, Israel carried it out, and Israel bears full responsibility for it.”

—————————————————————————

On September 9, 2025, the Israeli military launched a targeted strike in Doha, Qatar, aimed at assassinating senior Hamas leaders, including Khalil al-Hayya, the deputy chairman of Hamas’s Political Bureau and chief negotiator in ceasefire talks. The attack occurred while the delegation was reportedly engaged in discussions around a U.S.-backed Gaza ceasefire proposal.

Despite the precision of the operation—codenamed Pisgat HaEsh (“Summit of Fire”)—Khalil al-Hayya survived. However, the strike caused multiple explosions across the Katara district, leaving at least 35 people dead, including seven civilians seeking aid. The full casualty list remains sealed by Qatari authorities, but eyewitnesses described scenes of chaos, smoke, and panic in what was previously considered a neutral diplomatic zone.

“Did you know that Qatar hosts one of the US’s biggest military bases in the Persian Gulf, with many air defense systems present, yet none of the U.S. THAAD systems fired a single shot to defend Qatar against the Israeli invasion”? – PressTV

This is not just another escalation—it’s a flagrant breach of international law.
Why This Matters:

• Qatar is not a war zone. It is a sovereign state and a recognized mediator in the Gaza conflict.
• Targeting political figures on foreign soil—especially during peace negotiations—is a violation of the UN Charter, the Geneva Conventions, and the principle of state sovereignty.
• The assassination attempt undermines diplomatic efforts and sets a dangerous precedent for extraterritorial warfare.
  Legal Implications:
• Under Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, states are prohibited from using force against the territorial integrity or political independence of another state.
• The Rome Statute of the ICC defines intentional targeting of civilians and political figures in non-combat zones as war crimes.
• Qatar has condemned the attack as “cowardly” and is reportedly reviewing its role as host and mediator for Hamas leadership.
  Strategic Fallout:
• The strike may push Hamas leadership further underground or into more hostile alliances.
• It risks destabilizing Qatar’s diplomatic standing and could trigger regional retaliation.
• Most critically, it signals that no space is safe—not even negotiation tables.

This is not about defending Hamas. It’s about defending international norms, civilian safety, and the sanctity of diplomacy. When assassination replaces negotiation, the world loses its last tools for peace.